ARC Review: Wicked Saints

wickedsaints.png

WICKED SAINTS
EMILY A. DUNCAN
SERIES: Something Dark and Holy, #1
GENRES/ SUBJECTS: YA fantasy

★★★

Goodreads // Wordery // Book Depository

Content/ Trigger Warning: Self-harm and blood-letting is central to the magic system and happens often and throughout the story.

For fans of: Darkling/Alina and Rey/ Kylo Ren

 

Wicked Saints (Something Dark and Holy, #1)A girl who can speak to gods must save her people without destroying herself.

A prince in danger must decide who to trust.

A boy with a monstrous secret waits in the wings.

Together, they must assassinate the king and stop the war.

In a centuries-long war where beauty and brutality meet, their three paths entwine in a shadowy world of spilled blood and mysterious saints, where a forbidden romance threatens to tip the scales between dark and light. Wicked Saints is the thrilling start to Emily A. Duncan’s devastatingly Gothic Something Dark and Holy trilogy.

A copy of this was provided free of charge from the publisher in return for an honest review.

 

Hahaha….

Okay, this review might be messy, so strap in.

I spent so long agonising over how to rate this book! This one one of my most anticipated books of the year and I have very, very mixed feelings and, I suspect, some unpopular ones. It’s a book of two very different parts.

I struggled with the beginning of the book. Really, really struggled. To be honest, if this hadn’t been an ARC for review, I’d probably have DNF’ed the book.

The plotting is slow. Very slow. Despite blood-shed, angry gods and a protagonist on the run. Somehow, it still feels slow.

The world-building feels messy to me. I have no problem with the blood-letting magic system (although, as above, this is something to be very aware of. It’s not one-off, but throughout the book and central to the story). However, I don’t feel like it was ever really explained very clearly. How are the spells created and written down, why does blood activate them, what’s the education system for learning? The politics (both between the warring countries and within the Tranavian court/ government) was the same. I didn’t feel like there was anything happening beyond what was going on with the two or three characters in that very moment. There wasn’t any real depth to the world beyond them.

Similarly, the characters were very two-dimensional for much of the first half. I still don’t feel I know much about Nadya as a person, her personality is never developed. Of all the characters I thought that Serefin was the only one I really felt a connection to, and even then it took a long time to get there.

However — and it’s a big however — the book started to pick up around the second half: once Nadya and the others reached the royal palace (although it wasn’t until almost the three-quarter mark that I felt really interested and invested in the book). Around this point in the story, the plot took a couple of sharp twists and the excitement really amped up.

I really, really liked this last section of the story (the third act, basically). I wish the book had started at a later point in the story. The entire first half have could have been cut down and it felt to me more like padding so as to make the story run for a full trilogy. I’m curious whether Wicked Saints would have been stronger as part of a duology. That aside, I can’t say much about this section without giving too much away (since it’s right at the end) but I really did think the last 20% of the book was really good: full of action, surprises and character moments.

Which brings me back to: I spent so long agonising over how to rate this book.

3-stars is a compromise. I’d rate the last part much higher (4 to 4.5 perhaps?) but the first part was so slow and poorly developed I just can’t go any higher. I just can’t justify trawling through 75% of a book before it becomes worth reading.

But!

But.

The ending is great and, weirdly, I think I’d actually still pick up the second book because now I’m interested. I just don’t think it should have taken 300 wasted pages to get there.

 

From More Bloggers

Paul’s Picks

TBR and Beyond

Kaitlyn Gosiaco

Cotton Candy Book Witch

Hit or Miss Books

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “ARC Review: Wicked Saints

  1. I rated this 5 stars, and yet I actually agree with basically all of this 😀 I didn’t REALLY struggle with the first half, but it definitely picked up later.

    I think it’s a trilogy because each of the three characters has a book, which is… if this was Nadia’s book, that’s kind of disappointing, because while I liked her, I agree that she was kind of flat? I don’t know. I don’t think she completely lacked personality, but if I have to rank the three mains, she’d come 3rd.

    And it was the ending for me too that convinced me to look forward to the second book 😀

    I’m really, REALLY glad you came around on Serefin though.

    Like

    1. Thank you! It was a really hard one to rate for me, and so I thought your review provided another really great point of view on it. I’m really glad you loved it and I’m glad we can both look forward to the sequel 🙂

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s